Why You Should Not Use the ITCV With Robust Standard Errors (and What to Do Instead)
Best Paper, Research Methods Division, Academy of Management 2026
@article{itcv-robust-standard-errors,
author = {Sirio Lonati and Jesper N. Wulff},
title = {Why You Should Not Use the ITCV With Robust Standard Errors (and What to Do Instead)},
journal = {Organizational Research Methods},
year = {2026},
}
Abstract
The Impact Threshold of a Confounding Variable (ITCV) is commonly interpreted as the minimum product of correlations an omitted variable would need to have with both the outcome and predictor of interest to overturn a study’s conclusions. We show formally and confirm through Monte Carlo simulations that this interpretation breaks down in regression models with heteroskedasticity- or cluster-robust standard errors. We recommend instead a bootstrap-based sensitivity analysis derived from the sensemakr framework, which maintains close-to-nominal coverage across all conditions examined. We provide Stata and R implementations through our bootmakr package, offer practical guidance, and demonstrate the approach by reproducing a published study.
See also
- [Paper]Hic Sunt Dracones: On the Risks of Comparing the ITCV With Control Variable Correlations
- [Paper]A Critical Evaluation of the Impact Threshold of a Confounding Variable in Management Research
- [Software]bootmakr
- [Software]bootmakr for Stata
- [Paper]Diagnostics Without Microdata: Assessing Credibility of Event Studies and Difference-in-Differences Estimates After Publication